Legal Opinion

Fewel v. Fewel

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1943No. L. A. 18329PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

We have before us two appeals, one from an order filed November 7, 1941, and one from a similar order filed January 5, 1942. Stripped of unnecessary details the record establishes that in a proceeding instituted by defendant to secure modification (after final judgment) of an order awarding to the plaintiff the custody of the two minor children of the parties, the trial court refused to hear evidence on the part of plaintiff and made the initial order of modification, which is the controlling subject of this appeal, based exclusively on the recommendation of a court investigator of domestic…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Prouty v. ProutyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Washburn v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  5. People ex rel. Morgan v. HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kesseler v. KesselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Gilmore v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API