Legal Opinion

Coast Bank v. Minderhout

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1964No. L. A. 27261PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment foreclosing an equitable mortgage on certain real property in San Luis Obispo County. .The trial court overruled defendants’ general demurrer and-upon defendants’ failure to answer the complaint decreed foreclosure and ordered a sale of the property. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 585, subd. 4.)

From January 18 to November 12, 1957, plaintiff bank 1 made several loans to Burton and Donald Enright, who executed'a promissory note for the full amount of the indebted ness. In a separate instrument dated January 18, 1957, 2 the Enrights agreed that they would not transfer…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Seymour v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API