Legal Opinion
Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. Dieden
California Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1960No. S. F. No. 20451PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court correctly interpreted the contract admittedly existing between the parties. We are of the opinion that, under the facts here existing, the question of interpretation was primarily one of fact, and that all of the findings of the trial court on this issue are amply supported by the evidence. For that reason, we are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
The parties here involved are the plaintiff and one of the appellants, the Crestview Cemetery Association, a nonprofit corporation that owned some land in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Brown v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Dabney v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Burbridge v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CO. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.