Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bowes

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1937No. S. F. 15660PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Some of the plaintiffs are stockholders of the Six-twenty Jones Corporation and as such are beneficiaries under a certain voting trust agreement. Two of the trustees under said agreement are also plaintiffs. By this action it was sought to remove the defendants, W. K. Bowes, E. L. Bowes and Arthur H. Garland, the remaining trustees under the agreement. The plaintiff beneficiaries expressly sued on behalf of themselves and all of the other numerous stockholders and beneficiaries under the agreement. The court made findings and entered judgment removing W. K. Bowes and E. L. Bowes as voting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Davis v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sammons v. DavisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Fanucchi v. Coberly-West Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API