Legal Opinion

Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1913No. Docket Nos. 12, 13, and 14PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Tappan, J. Assumpsit by Morris M. Silverstone against the London Assurance Corporation. Actions against the Northern Assurance Company, Limited, of London, and against the Sovereign Fire Assurance Company of Canada were consolidated by stipulation and tried with said cause. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Writs of error in the above-named cases were sued out to review judgments for the plaintiff for the full amount insured in the several policies involved in the circuit court for the county of St. Clair. The three cases were by stipulation tried together. The amount of insurance involved here is $5,000; $4,600 on stock in trade and $400 on fixtures. This *527insurance was divided as follows: The London Assurance Corporation, $1,600 on stock and $400 on fixtures. Policy issued April 11, 1911. The Sovereign Fire Assurance Company of Canada, $1,000 on stock. Policy issued September 30, 1911. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Peoples v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. LenkevichMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. KanarMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Herpolsheimer v. A. B. Herpolsheimer Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API