Legal Opinion

Tubbs v. Dwelling-House Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error to Tuscola. .(Beach, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath,- J.

This is an action upon a five-year policy of insurance, issued by defendant May 14, 1887, — $100 on plaintiff’s frame dwelling-house; $700 on household furniture, beds and bedding, wearing apparel, provisions and stores, piano, organ, and sewing-machine, in said dwelling; $60 on frame ice and milk house; and $50 on dairy furniture, provisions, and stores, — situate on a farm owned by plaintiff. The application sets forth that applicant’s interest in the property was under contract with one Lacey, who held the title, and that the property was incumbered with the sum of $3,000 due…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Insurance Co. v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  3. Kenton Insurance v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  4. Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Chase v. PerleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Hope Spoke Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API