Legal Opinion

Winekoff v. Pospisil

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1970No. 8 April Term 1970, Docket No. 52,244PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s appeal to the Court of Appeals posed but one question; whether the evidentiary admission during trial of this suit for negligence, of a chart headed “Stopping Distance— Passenger Cars,” constituted reversible error. See the recent annotation, 9 ALR3d 976, “Admissibility in Evidence, in Automobile Negligence Action, of Charts Showing Braking Distance, Reaction Times, Etc.”

The chart was a part of onr Secretary of State’s widely distributed publication, in pamphlet form, entitled “What Every Driver Must Know.” Division 2 ruled that such admission was prejudicial (13 Mich App 293).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DawellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McGuire v. RabautMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Noyce v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Norris v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Larry W. Robbins v. Robert W. WhelanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Gallegos v. Glaser Crandell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Thomas v. CommerfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API