Legal Opinion
Howard v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1956No. Civ. 21617PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing his action after the demurrer to his amended complaint was sustained and he refused to further amend. The object of the action is to recover taxes on certain jewelry for the years 1953 and 1954 paid by appellant to the city of Los Angeles and county of Los Angeles. The facts alleged in the complaint are deemed true and the following is a summary of the pertinent allegations.
The jewelry was purchased by appellant in 1943 while he and his wife were residents of Beverly Hills in Los Angeles County. An action for divorce and other relief was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of San Luis Obispo v. PettitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bessolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marin v. JacuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hancock v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.