Legal Opinion
Marin v. Jacuzzi
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1964No. Civ. 20990PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The plaintiff, Rino Marin, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to his second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. The only question on appeal is whether the complaint states a cause of action for intentional and unjustifiable interference with contractual relations.
The complaint alleged: that the appellant was a shareholder and employee of Jacuzzi Bros. Inc., a corporation, 1 of which respondent, Candido Jacuzzi, was vice-president and general manager as well as a director; he and the remaining respondents constituted the majority of the board of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.