Legal Opinion

Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1937No. S. F. 15724; S. F. 15725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Raymond Benjamin and Hartley F. Peart for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

These two actions, while appealed separately, have been argued together, and as they present the same identical question, they may and will be considered in one opinion. The only difference in the two actions, is that in action S. F. No. 15724, the plaintiff seeks to recover taxes paid for the calendar year 1930, while in action S. F. No. 15725 recovery is sought for the year 1931. These actions differ in no material respect from the two actons bearing the same title and reported in 3 Cal. (2d) 83 [43 Pac. (2d) 278], except as to the years during which the taxes involved accrued. In our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. American Distilling Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Howard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Special Dist. Risk Mgt. Authority v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API