Legal Opinion

Holmes v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1968No. Civ. 24370PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

—Plaintiff, a minor appearing by his guardian ad litem, filed a complaint purporting to allege four causes of action against the City of Oakland and other defendants for damages for personal injuries incurred when a Santa Pe railroad train ran over plaintiff, severing both of his legs. The court sustained with leave to amend the City’s demurrer to all four causes of action on the ground that none of them stated a cause of action against the City. Plaintiff having declined to amend, the court entered judgment of dismissal in favor of the City, from which plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff concedes…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Garrison v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Daniel v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Searcy v. Hemet Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API