Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1902No. L.A. No. 935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion. John Garber, White & Monroe, and J. S. Chapman, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This case was before this court upon a former appeal from an order appointing a receiver, and is reported in 124 Cal. at page 368. Upon that appeal the order appointing the receiver was reversed. Upon the present record several appeals were taken, but all have been settled and dismissed, except an appeal taken by the defendant from an order directing the receiver to pay to the assessor of the county of Los Angeles the sum of $1,845.22, the tax claimed to have been levied and assessed upon moneys and solvent credits in the hands of the receiver on the first Monday in March, 1899.
The…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States Overseas Airlines v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Howard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bessolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Mosee v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915