Legal Opinion
Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1984No. 83 Civ. 4742PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
In this action against the defendant, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”), the plaintiff, Tanyah Amarnare, alleges that Merrill Lynch was her “joint employer” with Mature Temps, Inc. (“Mature Temps”), not named as a defendant, and that Merrill Lynch violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 1 by discharging her from her temporary job because of her sex (female), race (black), and national origin (Afro-American). She worked for Merrill Lynch as an administrative assistant for two weeks, from April 14 to April 30, 1981.
Merr…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Despina Spirides v. John E. Reinhardt, Director of United States International Communication AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Sibley Memorial Hospital v. Verne WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Graves v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Magnuson v. Peak Technical Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Dortz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- DeWitt v. LiebermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Wynn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.