Legal Opinion
DeWitt v. Lieberman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1999No. 97 CIV. 4651(SAS)PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
This is a pro se action for sexual harassment and employment discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., the New York State Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y.C. Admin. Code, § 8-107. The federal claims against defendant New York State Housing Finance Agency (“HFA”) consist of quid pro quo and hostile work environment. The only federal claim against defendant The Parks Group, Inc. (“Parks”) is one of retaliation. There are no…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Patane v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Soloviev v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Hicks v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Strauss v. New York State Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.