Legal Opinion
Dortz v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 5, 1995No. 92 Civ. 9202 (PKL)PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
Defendants have submitted objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) prepared by the Honorable Theodore H. Katz, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the referral of this Court. The Court has reviewed Judge Katz’s Report, and made a de novo determination, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that Judge Katz’s exhaustive, well-reasoned Report is legally correct and proper. See United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676, 100 S.Ct. 2406, 2412, 65 L.Ed.2d 424 (1980) (“[Section 636(b)(1) ] permit[s] whatever reliance a district…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Pace v. Ogden Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gonzalez v. BrattonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Steven E. Kader, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Paper Software, Inc. And Michael McCue Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Adeniji v. Administration for Children ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.