Legal Opinion
New York Ins. Co. v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1925No. 15248PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This action was bi-ought by the defendant in error against the New York Life Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, to recover upon a policy of insurance issued upon tlie li.e of Mose F. Clark. The defendant in error was the mother of the insured, and the beneficiary named in the policy. The parties will be hereinafter designated as plaintiff and defendant, as they were in the trial court.
The defendant in its answer admitted the issuance of the policy and the 'death of the insured, but relied for a defense to the action upon untruthful answers to questions propounded•by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- New York Life Insurance v. StaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Reserve Loan Life Ins. Co. v. IsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. HouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. v. WestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Allied Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.