Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Investment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1936No. 1287PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit to recover on two blanket position bonds similarly conditioned and given to indemnify plaintiff against loss suffered through larceny, theft, embezzlement, misappropriation of funds, or any other fraudulent act of its employees. The first bond was executed on May 3, 1932, and remained in force one year. The extent of the indemnity provided was $5,000 on each employee and $15,000 additional on the secretary-treasurer. The second was executed on May 3, 1933 and provided like indemnity of $2,500 on each employee…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. United States Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Puget Sound National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.