Legal Opinion

Allied Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1960No. 38438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

The policies were issued to plaintiff on October 11, 1955. The recovery was for expenses during confinement in hospital between January 28, 1957, and February-10, 1957, for removal of prostate gland and treatment for diabetes.

Defendant denies any liability under the policies, and although its argument is presented under three separate propositions, we deem its sufficient to confine our discussion to whether the trial court committed reversible error by failing to sustain defendant’s demurrer to the evidence and motion for directed verdict.

The record reveals that the primary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atlas Life Insurance Company v. EastmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Reserve Life Insurance Company v. LyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. American Ins. Co. of Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. RamageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Allied Steel Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Malone v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brunson v. MID-WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Ivey v. Henry's Diesel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. DickasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API