Legal Opinion
New York Life Insurance v. Stagg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 12, 1923No. 12897PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was brought by defendant in error against the New York Life Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, to recover upon two policies of insurance issued upon the life of Edward R- Stagg. The parties will hereinafter be referred to ns plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendant in its answer alleged that prior to the issuance of the policies of insurance, Edward R. Stagg made a written application for such insurance, and thereafter submitted himself for an examination before the medical examiner of the defendant company, and made certain answers in writing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Morrow v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. HouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. ShermerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- New York Ins. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.