Legal Opinion

Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 1985No. 1 CA-IC 3215PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

The issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether the claimant is entitled to payment for medical procedures that could allow him to father children. Because the administrative law judge’s determination was based, in part, upon erroneous conclusions of law, we set aside the award denying benefits.

On October 2, 1980, claimant Stephen Regnier, a test car driver for Ford Motor Company (respondent), was injured while at work. As a result of the industrial incident, claimant is a quadriplegic and is unable to have an erection and/or to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Home Insurance Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Peace River Elec. Corp. v. ChoateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Crain Burton Ford Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Tobias v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Carbajal v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Merkens v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API