Legal Opinion

Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 3, 1985PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

The primary issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the construction of a self-contained apartment attached to the home of an injured worker’s parents may constitute “medical, surgical or other treatment ... necessary to cure and relieve” or “other appliance” under N.J.S.A. 34:15-15 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act); and if so, whether there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the finding that the construction of the apartment addition was necessary and that its cost was reasonable.

The petitioner,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Panzino v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gargiulo v. GargiuloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Derebery v. Pitt County Fire MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Brock v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Akef v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API