Legal Opinion

Crain Burton Ford Co. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 5, 1984No. CA 83-353PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that the appellee’s impotence was a result of a compen-sable back injury and that the surgical procedure for a prosthetic penile implantation was necessary medical treatment.

Appéllee injured his back while working for appellant and underwent surgery in 1973. He subsequently developed bladder and bowel incontinence and impotence. It was determined that he was suffering from a demyelinating disease, thought to be either multiple sclerosis, primary lateral sclerosis, or amyotrophic lateral…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Claim of Nallan v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. McDaniel v. Hilyard Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Claim of Clark v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Harris Cattle Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Canas v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Gerber Products v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. StottsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Bates v. Frost Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API