Legal Opinion
Home Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 23, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 979PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Chief Judge.
On this review of an award entered by the respondent Industrial Commission, the basic issue is whether the responsibility for the payment of the injured workman’s continuing medical benefits is that of the petitioning insurance carrier or that of the respondent Commission’s Special Fund. 1
The workman was injured on February 22, 1972 when he slipped and fell from a scaffold. As a result of the fall, he sustained numerous severe injuries, including rupture of the liver, rupture of the gastrohepatic ligament, subcapcula hematoma of the spleen, fractured wrist, lacerated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Minton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Aragon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baca v. Bueno FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lane v. Levi Strauss & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Western Cable v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.