Legal Opinion

Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 2009No. 1 CA-IC 08-0027PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action presents the question whether housekeeping services are com-pensable under Arizona’s workers’ compensation system as a matter of law. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 23-1062(A) (1995), we conclude such sendees are not compensable and affirm the award of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”).

I. JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW

¶ 2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. sections 12-120.21(A)(2) (2003) and 23-951(A) (1995), and Arizona Rules of Procedure for Special Actions 10. In reviewing findings and awards of the Industrial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. ARIZONA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Johnson v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. Mikel Lo, M.D. and Mikel W. Lo, M.d, Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API