Legal Opinion

Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1983No. 16676-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted the petition of the respondent workman, Edmond B. Johnson, to review a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals, which set aside an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona allowing the reopening of Johnson’s claim.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. On or about 3 October 1977, Johnson received a “stomach strain” from lifting objects in the course of his employment. He was seen by Dr. Robles, who reported to the Industrial Commission as follows:

17. COMPLAINTS AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS, IN DETAIL: The patient walks…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Crocker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Circle K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Compensation Fund v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gallegos v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API