Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award granting “medical, surgical and hospital benefits” pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1062(A). We must determine two issues: (1) whether an employee forfeited his right to have modifications made to his residence when he did not give the carrier prior notice of his intent to move to the residence; and (2) whether a van falls within the category of “other apparatus” for which the carrier must pay under § 23-1062(A). Because we find that the administrative law judge applied the law correctly and because there is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Claim of Kranis v. Trunz, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of De Croix v. N. Sumergrade & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Quaker Oats Co. v. CihaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Meyer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Crouch v. West Virginia Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.