Legal Opinion

Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 16, 1987No. 1 CA-IC 3507PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award granting “medical, surgical and hospital benefits” pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1062(A). We must determine two issues: (1) whether an employee forfeited his right to have modifications made to his residence when he did not give the carrier prior notice of his intent to move to the residence; and (2) whether a van falls within the category of “other apparatus” for which the carrier must pay under § 23-1062(A). Because we find that the administrative law judge applied the law correctly and because there is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Claim of Kranis v. Trunz, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Claim of De Croix v. N. Sumergrade & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Quaker Oats Co. v. CihaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Meyer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Crouch v. West Virginia Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API