Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided November 30, 2007No. 07-0286/ARPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review of this case to consider whether the military judge erred by instructing the court members that they could convict Appellant of the offense of indecent assault without agreeing on which of three possible factual scenarios constituted the offense. We hold that the military judge correctly instructed the members and affirm the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals.
i.
A general court-martial with members convicted Appellant of two specifications of failing to obey a lawful general regulation, two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. MilesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. McMurrinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
- United States v. Private E2 CURTIS R. LONGArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Private First Class PHILLIP A. HEARN (Corrected Copy)Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.