Richardson v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
A federal criminal statute forbids any “person” from “engaging] in a continuing criminal enterprise.” 84 Stat. 1264, 21 U. S. C. § 848(a). It defines “continuing criminal enterprise” (CCE) as involving a “violation]” of the drug statutes where “such violation is a part of a continuing series of violations.” § 848(e). We must decide whether a jury has to agree unanimously about which specific violations make up the “continuing series of violations.” We hold that the jury must do so. That is to say, a jury in a federal criminal ease brought under §848 must unanimously agree not only that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by765 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
760 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.