United States v. Private First Class PHILLIP A. HEARN (Corrected Copy)
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
TATE, Chief Judge:
A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of carnal knowledge and “indecent acts or liberties with a person under 16,” in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for five years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. This case is before the court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. FRANCISCO C. LARAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. Private First Class DESTRO M. DELA PENAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. Sergeant BARTHOLOMEW D. VIERSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Staff Sergeant TIMOTHY A. SKAGGSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016