Legal Opinion

Schad v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided September 13, 1991No. 90-5551PublishedCited by 1,272 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Souter

This case presents two questions: whether a first-degree murder conviction under jury instructions that did not require agreement on whether the defendant was guilty of premeditated murder or felony murder is unconstitutional; and whether the principle recognized in Beck v. Alabama, 447 U. S. 625 (1980), entitles a defendant to instructions on all offenses that are lesser than, and included within, a capital offense as charged. We answer no to each.

I — I

On August 9, 1978, a highway worker discovered the badly decomposed body of 74-year-old Lorimer Grove in the underbrush off U. S. Highway 89,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,272 opinions

  1. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

1,267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API