Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E2 CURTIS R. LONG

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 30, 2014No. ARMY 20120114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KRAUSS, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of rape by using force in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2006 & Supp. IV) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The court-martial acquitted appellant of one specification of aggravated sexual assault by causing bodily harm and one specification of assault consummated by a battery alleged under Articles 120 and 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 920, 928 (2006 & Supp. IV). Prior to these contested charges, appellant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. OberCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WeiserU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  2. United States v. GinnUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. GomezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. MotsenbockerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API