United States v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court.
In United States v. Walters, 58 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F.2003), this Court held that the *202Court of Criminal Appeals could not review a conviction for factual sufficiency under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2000), when the appellant was charged with committing an illegal act “on divers occasions,” but was found guilty at trial by exceptions and substitutions to a single unspecified act. Walters, 58 M.J. at 394, 396-97. The decision in that case turned on the fact that the members had found the appellant “not guilty”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. BarberiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. TrewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- Aguilar-Turcios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.