Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 23, 2008No. 07-0685/AFPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

In United States v. Walters, 58 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F.2003), this Court held that the *202Court of Criminal Appeals could not review a conviction for factual sufficiency under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2000), when the appellant was charged with committing an illegal act “on divers occasions,” but was found guilty at trial by exceptions and substitutions to a single unspecified act. Walters, 58 M.J. at 394, 396-97. The decision in that case turned on the fact that the members had found the appellant “not guilty”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. BarberiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  2. United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  3. United States v. TrewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. Aguilar-Turcios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API