Legal Opinion

Wolf v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1931No. 3414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal involves the proper dutiable classification for customs purposes of .certain small, cheaply constructed phonographs, which were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as toys under paragraph 1414, Tariff Act of 1922.

*133The importers protested the said classification and the assessment of duty and claimed the merchandise to be dutiable under several paragraphs of the same act, but here rely upon the claim for classification under paragraph 1444 of said act as phonographs, or under paragraph 372 of said act as “all other machines or parts thereof.”'

The United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API