Mego Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This action involves the question as to the proper tariff classification of merchandise imported from Taiwan in 1971 which was described on the invoice as (1) a “Vinyl sponge1 leather glove” (hereafter referred to as “the baseball glove or gloves”) and (2) a “Vinyl leather boxing glove” (hereafter referred to as “the boxing glove or gloves”). The merchandise was classified by the government under item 737.90 of the tariff schedules as other toys, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the modified rate of 21 percent ad valorem.2
Plaintiff contends that “the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. WilsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- F. J. Strauss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978