United States v. Bernard
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The articles which are the subject of litigation here were entered for consumption as musical instruments. They were returned for duty by the collector as toys, at 70 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1414 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which is as follows:
1414. Dolls, and parts of dolls, doll heads, toy marbles, of whatever materials composed, air rifles, toy balloons, toy books without reading matter other than letters, numerals, or descriptive words, bound or unbound, and parts thereof, garlands, festooning and - Christmas tree decorations made wholly or in chief value of tinsel wire, lame…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. WakemCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. SearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Glemby's Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.