Legal Opinion

Fandray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1983No. 124PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

Appellant was injured in an automobile accident and filed a claim for certain No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance benefits with appellee-insurer (Nationwide). The specific claim here at issue which was rejected by the insurer, is for replacement services loss. Appellant pressed his claim and won an award before a Board of Arbitrators in the amount of $85 for replacement services and $525 for counsel fees based on appellant’s need to bring suit to enforce his claim. Nationwide took an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas. After the presentation of the evidence, the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Platts v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Stephens v. CarraraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Adkins v. Auto Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hephner v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Hauck v. Ohio Casualty Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API