Legal Opinion
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1987No. C4-86-1102PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Appellant Dolores A. Motschenbacher sued respondent New Hampshire Insurance Company to recover benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act following the death of her husband.
On appeal, appellant challenges the adequacy of the trial court’s award of interest on overdue benefit payments under Minn. Stat. § 65B.54, subd. 2 (1984). Respondent has filed a notice of review, contesting the verdict and the interest awarded by the trial court. We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LaValley v. National Family Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. SankeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995