Legal Opinion
Hauck v. Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1987No. 434PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
Once again, we are presented with a narrow issue under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, (No-fault Act) Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, § 101 et seq. 40 P.S. § 1009.101 et seq., repealed by the Act of February 12, 1984, P.L. 26, No. 11, § 8(a), effective October 1, 1984.
On this appeal, we must determine whether a collateral insurer under the No-fault Act is obligated to reimburse an automobile accident victim for the difference between (1) the amounts accepted by the health care providers in full satisfaction of their bills and (2) the amounts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fandray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kashner v. Geisinger ClinicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Collins v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Brower v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hill v. Port Authority Transit SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Kershner v. Prudential InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.