Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Defendant Austin Mutual Insurance Company (Austin) appeals from a judgment entered in Goodhue County District Court, awarding plaintiffs medical expense benefits and replacement service loss benefits under their no-fault insurance policy with defendant. On appeal, defendant contends (1) that plaintiffs are not entitled to those no-fault benefits because plaintiff Ferol Nadeau’s injuries did not arise out of the use of a motor vehicle, and (2) that, if they did, plaintiffs would not be entitled to replacement service loss benefits because no expenses were actually incurred by or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Stadler v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Classified Insurance Corp. v. VodinelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Heaslip v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Dept.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Hephner v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.