Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1984No. C1-83-684PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Defendant Austin Mutual Insurance Company (Austin) appeals from a judgment entered in Goodhue County District Court, awarding plaintiffs medical expense benefits and replacement service loss benefits under their no-fault insurance policy with defendant. On appeal, defendant contends (1) that plaintiffs are not entitled to those no-fault benefits because plaintiff Ferol Nadeau’s injuries did not arise out of the use of a motor vehicle, and (2) that, if they did, plaintiffs would not be entitled to replacement service loss benefits because no expenses were actually incurred by or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Stadler v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Classified Insurance Corp. v. VodinelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Heaslip v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Dept.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  5. Hephner v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API