Platts v. Government Employees Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant contends that the statute of limitations contained in the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act 1 should not have been applied to bar her claim. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the order of the lower court. 2
The facts which gave rise to the instant appeal are as follows: On January 1, 1976, appellant was injured in a motor vehicle accident. She was insured at the time under a No-Fault policy issued by Government Employers Insurance Company (hereinafter Geico), the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Smith v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Moore v. McComseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ranker v. Skyline Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Brinkley v. PealerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Erin Killeen, a Minor by Carole Killeen, Her Mother and Guardian v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Hall v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.