Legal Opinion

Platts v. Government Employees Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1982No. 2484PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant contends that the statute of limitations contained in the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act 1 should not have been applied to bar her claim. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the order of the lower court. 2

The facts which gave rise to the instant appeal are as follows: On January 1, 1976, appellant was injured in a motor vehicle accident. She was insured at the time under a No-Fault policy issued by Government Employers Insurance Company (hereinafter Geico), the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Smith v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moore v. McComseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ranker v. Skyline Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Brinkley v. PealerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Erin Killeen, a Minor by Carole Killeen, Her Mother and Guardian v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Hall v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API