Legal Opinion
Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1997No. C8-96-1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PETERSON, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action to determine coverage under an automobile insurance policy, the district court concluded that certain automobile repair services for a vehicle owned by Jerome Lenz were compensable replacement services within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 5 (1996) and granted summary judgment in Lenz’s favor. We affirm.
FACTS 1
In December 1995, respondent Jerome Lenz was involved in a motor vehicle accident while driving a vehicle owned by his wife and insured by appellant Depositors Insurance Company (Depositors). Lenz was injured in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- City of St. Louis Park v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Adkins v. Auto Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Midwest Great Dane Trailers, Inc. v. Great Dane Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000