Legal Opinion

Habecker v. Nationwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1982No. 116PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal from a motion granting summary judgment to the insurer appellee presents an issue of statutory construction involving the time span over which an insurer will be liable for “replacement services” payments provided under Section 202(c) of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. § 1009.202(c).

Again, this court is asked to interpret ambiguous language in the No-Fault Act. “Replacement services loss” is defined as “expenses reasonably incurred in obtaining ordinary and necessary services in lieu of those the victim would have performed, not for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Motorists Insurance Companies v. EmigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API