Legal Opinion
In Re Rosenkrantz
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 2000No. B132370, B138635PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 Cal.Rptr.2d 279 (2000)
80 Cal.App.4th 409
In re Robert ROSENKRANTZ, On Habeas Corpus.
C.A. Terhune, as Director, etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent;
Robert Rosenkrantz, Real Party in Interest.
Nos. B132370, B138635.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One.
April 27, 2000.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 2000.
Review Denied July 12, 2000.[*]
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Paul D. Gifford, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Darrell L. Lepkowsky, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Rita Lane Medellin…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Rosenkrantz v. MarshallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- In Re CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Milot v. HawsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.