Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1977No. S.F. 23549PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, Acting C. J.

Petitioners Leonard Ross, Joe Crivello, Larry Dean, Ole Olsen and Russell Papenhausen, members of the Plumas County Board of Supervisors, seek review of a judgment of the Sacramento County Superior Court finding them guilty of contempt for wilfully violating a court order requiring the payment of retroactive welfare benefits. The supervisors challenge the judgment of contempt on a number of grounds, claiming (1) that, as nonparties to the original court action, they were not bound by the earlier order; (2) that the contempt proceedings were improperly instituted…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API