Legal Opinion

In Re Schoengarth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1967No. Crim. 10331PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

By this application for habeas corpus petitioner challenges the power of the Adult Authority to condition its offer of parole on his agreeing to be released to the custody of Colorado representatives for trial on charges pending against him in that state, and the authority’s power to redetermine his sentence upon his refusal to sign such an agreement. As will appear, both actions are within the jurisdiction of the authority. Secondly, petitioner complains that prison officials have refused to allow him to keep legal research notes in his cell, in violation of his right of reasonable access to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Mark O. Hatfield, Governor of the State of Oregon v. Paul R. BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. John Houston Sellars v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API