Legal Opinion
Rosenkrantz v. Marshall
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 1, 2006No. CV 05-3836 GAF (AJW)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FEESS, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and petitioner’s objections. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Background
WISTRICH, United States Magistrate Judge.
When petitioner was 18 years old, his younger brother, Joey,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re NunezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hayward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re BetterncourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Robles v. DennisonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.