Legal Opinion

In Re Caswell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 2001No. A093799PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEVENS, J.

Respondent Steven Caswell (Caswell) was granted parole by appellant Board of Prison Terms (Board) in 1986, with a release date in September 2000. In 1999, the Board found cause to rescind the prisoner’s unexecuted grant of parole. After the trial court granted Caswell’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, overturning the rescission and reinstating Caswell’s parole release date, the Board appealed, contending the court erred because sufficient evidence supported its decision rescinding Caswell’s parole. We reverse the judgment.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Caswell is serving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. In Re PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carl D. McQuillion v. William Duncan, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Steven H. Caswell v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. In re TwinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API