In Re William M.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
This case raises the basic issue of whether a juvenile court may refuse to consider specific facts supporting the release of a juvenile prior to a jurisdictional hearing and, instead, establish a rule that all juveniles accused of a specified type of offense should automatically be detained. We give the reasons why we have concluded that the Juvenile Court Law protects the minor’s right to an individualized detention hearing, in which the court may not dispose of cases by mechanical rules on a categorical basis.
1. The facts
On March 17, 1970, the supervising probation…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Richardson v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.