Milot v. Haws
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed by respondent, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made.
1. Respondent’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s finding that petitioner has a liberty interest in parole suitability
Re…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murr v. MarshallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Orozco v. ClarkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Boyd v. ALMAGERDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Martinez v. MarshallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Owen v. ClarkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.