Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 2006No. Misc. Docket AG No. 68 September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary Or Remedial Action against Norman Joseph Lee, III, the respondent. The petition charged that respondent violated Rules 1.3 (Diligence), 2 1.4 (Communication), 3 and 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation) 4 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC), as adopted by Rule 16-812.

We referred the case, pursuant to Rule 16-752(a), 5 to the Honorable Lawrence R. Daniels, of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. TolarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. OberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KapoorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API